Gamers around the world have noticed a large trend in the video game industry in the last 15 years, massive growth with massive projects and unbelievable costs, goals and sales. We’ve seen the impossible become achievable in epic projects like World of Warcraft and huge sales figures from Halo 3 but we’ve also seen game titles fall down in a burning wreck.

Each studio tries to beat the next studio with crisp realistic graphics, real time physics engines, life-like explosions all with huge costs. Does it all sound familiar? If you’re a movie buff you’ve probably seen movie studios cranking out the same style of movie, high computer graphic effects with talented high priced actors making longer and longer films.

The only big difference? A game studio hires most of their talent for full time positions and then has to figure out what to do with them when the project ends. Perhaps this explains Microsoft’s effort to remove game studios like Ensemble, Bungie and FASA, it’s all too much to handle when a high budget project ships and time frees up in the studio.

Grand Theft Auto IV is said to have costs 100-million dollars to produce, how much of that was man power and specialized talent that now sits idle? Many studios end with layoffs as a congratulations for the hard work while bloggers and journalists write articles about the “downfall” and “destruction” of such a studio and share holders freaking because of drastic headcount reductions.

As projects continue to reach million dollar costs and specialized talent is brought in to handle computer graphics, movies, physics and lighting we’re looking more and more like we need to change how the game industry handles projects. Mark Pacini, Todd Keller and Jack Mathews, three core developers behind the Metroid franchise have struck out on their own all while thinking about the new formation of the game industry.

Mark Pacini told gamasutra, “the model in which games are made — with a staff of people upwards of 100 people a lot of the time — is kind of outdated now.” What’s the solution? Pacini said:

“Contractors now are being used more efficiently than they’ve ever been on game projects, and it’s become a more valid way to staff up your project. Rather than being looked down upon as a company that doesn’t want to hire somebody, it’s more fiscally responsible of the company to hire contractors, not to staff up and have a mass layoff at the end.” (kotaku)

Imagine a time where developers are contract-for-hire specialists in the industry, paid to do a project and move on to another project to handle the same style of work. The end result will be a lower-budget title with equal value to the game design because studios won’t have to pay benefits, handle layoffs, any potential walk-off “packages” and all the HR overhead that goes with hiring “part time” full time developers.

This diversity may spark new competition as small contract firms and individuals bid to get the deals they want and enjoy a good income for the work they do. Those that are aces in the field will stand out and be recognized for their accomplishments more than a simple entry in a scrolling game credit.

Unfortunately, this will mean that those awesome teams and studios that brought us hot titles will be a thing of the past. This will mean less iD Softwares, Epics and Square Enix’s as things becomes smaller groups of specialized workers. However, if it means the same quality titles with less risk to publishers and developers, we may get more hot titles than ever before without huge price hikes.

↑ Grab this Headline Animator