<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gaming Podcast 118: Jump The Shark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamingpodcast.net/2009/04/14/gaming-podcast-118-jump-the-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamingpodcast.net/2009/04/14/gaming-podcast-118-jump-the-shark/</link>
	<description>Welcome to gamingpodcast.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonahfalcon</title>
		<link>http://gamingpodcast.net/2009/04/14/gaming-podcast-118-jump-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>jonahfalcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingpodcast.net/?p=1127#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>2.0 was the best. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.0 was the best. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krud</title>
		<link>http://gamingpodcast.net/2009/04/14/gaming-podcast-118-jump-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Krud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingpodcast.net/?p=1127#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>3.0 was my first experience, so I had no ill will toward WotC. It wasn&#039;t until Hasbro took over that I got ticked. And yeah, 4.0 is utterly pointless for pen-and-paper purposes, in my opinion.

Also, not to get needlessly nitpicky or anything, but I don&#039;t think you could actually be a thief/paladin/monk, could you? Unless that was a 3.5 change. &#039;:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.0 was my first experience, so I had no ill will toward WotC. It wasn&#8217;t until Hasbro took over that I got ticked. And yeah, 4.0 is utterly pointless for pen-and-paper purposes, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Also, not to get needlessly nitpicky or anything, but I don&#8217;t think you could actually be a thief/paladin/monk, could you? Unless that was a 3.5 change. &#8216;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonahfalcon</title>
		<link>http://gamingpodcast.net/2009/04/14/gaming-podcast-118-jump-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>jonahfalcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingpodcast.net/?p=1127#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t pissed off when the sale was made. I was mildly disturbed when Wizards of the Coast said they&#039;d be revamping and fixing the game - by allowing things like level 20 halfling mage-slash-thief-slash-paladin-slash-monk-slash-fighters.

I became angry when 4.0 game out and they succeeded in turning it into a computer game version of D&amp;D, and sucking the life out of the actual roleplaying. Computer RPGs are the way they are because they LACK the ability to have an intelligent GM. It&#039;s the tail wagging the dog now.

At least GURPS is still out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t pissed off when the sale was made. I was mildly disturbed when Wizards of the Coast said they&#8217;d be revamping and fixing the game &#8211; by allowing things like level 20 halfling mage-slash-thief-slash-paladin-slash-monk-slash-fighters.</p>
<p>I became angry when 4.0 game out and they succeeded in turning it into a computer game version of D&amp;D, and sucking the life out of the actual roleplaying. Computer RPGs are the way they are because they LACK the ability to have an intelligent GM. It&#8217;s the tail wagging the dog now.</p>
<p>At least GURPS is still out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
