Sony, Next Big Software Company?

Every day we’re hearing of a company running through a round of layoffs or going out of business, it’s really not a happy time. Sony is not immune to the economic troubles either. Sony is talking restructuring and that involves a potential head count reduction of 16,000 jobs due to plant closings.

floppyThis leaves Sony with some hard decisions. Restructuring can mean drastic changes that effect all their product lines. The PlayStation 3 isn’t currently a shining example of high profit margins. The console needs time to reduce its overall cost, chip sizes and bring profitability. Is it in danger?

“Sony’s not in a position to halt all domestic production but it has to do something that drastic,” said Mitsushige Akino, chief fund manager at Ichiyoshi Investment Management. “If it announces plans to move production overseas while keeping only planning and development functions in Japan, that would be a positive.” (gamestooge)

The yen is losing value in our global economy making it more difficult to export the product and build any type of profitability plan. “A source said this month the company will likely suffer an annual operating loss of about $1.1 billion, its first such loss in 14 years” (news.yahoo.com) All this noise is making CEO Howard Stringer contemplate Sony’s involvement as a “software only” company, making us recall the changes at SEGA to this same result.

The Financial Times reported Sony will unveil details of its restructuring steps on Wednesday or Thursday. It said Chief Executive Howard Stringer was meeting with resistance from some executives to shifting the company’s focus to software from hardware and cutting jobs in Japan. (news.yahoo.com)

Is this just a case of a fearful executive trying to lay plans for a more stable future? Software is easier to develop, pays for itself quickly and becomes pure profit as it ages. Hardware requires constant upkeep at manufacturing facilities, chip reductions and a boat load of quality planning for first shipment. Would Sony go full software?

Let’s face it, Sony isn’t SEGA, they’ve been developing hardware for consumers since anyone can remember and they’ve been doing it with quality and market penetration. It seems absurd to think they’d forgo hardware designs in replacement of a full software solution to the problem. In addition, Sony has already invested a large amount of cash into seeing PS3 through it’s 10-year plan and letting that die now is realizing a huge loss on investment.

If Sony pushes through the economic and maintenance course, the PS3 will become highly profitable, much like the PS2 last generation (with a slower ramp up for sales). Even if they break even after ten years it seems a lot better than throwing all the effort away.

Perhaps Howard Stringer is talking “software” for the next generation home console? You think Sony will create a PlayStation 4?

0 thoughts on “Sony, Next Big Software Company?”

  1. why would they make a playstation 4 when they can just upgrade the tech thru firmware….. i think where they might be heading in terms of software since you can download full movies and games onto the console anyway so thats where the software pays for itself at…… plus the last time i check, the ps3 is capable of handling 4d graphics i dont hear nobody talking about that part of the tech at all if u dont believe me digg it up

  2. A few reasons a PS4 would trump software updates:

    1. CPU technology in 7 years is going to smoke what we have today. Competition will eventually eat you alive.

    2. Current hardware will reduce in price, but eventually be costly to keep alive as technology will just be no longer developed anymore. What happens when the CPU’s their utilizing are no longer manufactured?

    3. It’s hip to have new stuff, people like to buy new gadgets and game consoles. It’s a good marketing move to keep the hype up about your business.

    If the PS2 had firmware updates today, would we still all want one? Firmware isn’t going to fix the hardware being ancient in terms of technology.

  3. More pathetic FUD. The PS3 is doing fine. Ubisoft just reported they made more money off of the PS3 than the 360 and Wii. And didn’t EA and capcom say the same thing?

    The big 360 games seem to sell much more than the big PS3 games so people make up stories about poor sales. But PS3 games overall sell better than games on the other consoles.

    Sony has a lot wrapped up in the PS3 so no way will they dump it. Now Microsoft, they make horrible hardware. I won’t be surprised when they get out of videogames.

  4. @Brian:
    FUD stands for “fear uncertainty and doubt,” you realize that right? Usually you use that when an article is trying to invoke some type of doubt.

    Sony’s troubles aren’t FUD, their FACT.

    The rest focuses on “would they do this?” and ends with asking if they’d make a ps4 at this point.

    The last statement is more of what I was looking for in terms of a comment. As for PS3 games selling better than all the others (overall), I’d love to see some NPD figures on that, as I don’t believe it. Are you talking US sales figures, europe, japan?

    For US figures, I’d love to see proof. Considering the other two consoles have more units in the market, it’s easier for them to make more sales on field numbers alone.

    For Japan, I think it’s obvious that 360 won’t be winning anything. Of course, Nintendo owns that market pretty tight (isn’t it like 4:1 or something?)

  5. The current price tag on the ps3 is just ridiculous. it’s become a luxury product and in this harsh economic/financial climate people are just turned off by its hefty asking price considering how inexpensive the 360 seems in comparison. sony is going to lose money regardless so why not lower the price and make up for it in software sales. they’ve probably got their reasons but for me its a no brainer.

    I’m waiting out for GOW III, Killzone 2 and a possible price drop before i snag one.

  6. for starters EA lost tons of $$ trying to develope for ps3 .http://gamer.blorge.com/2008/02/03/ea-claims-ps3-harder-to-develop-for-than-xbox-360/

    Sony cannot count on software sales alone , They have no solid 3rd party devs lined up . Sony is just stuck people dont need to buy a ps3 now to use as a BD player with sub $200 players on the market now . I personally cannot see a recovery in sonys future with the pure ammount of loss upto this point .
    They might of won the format battle but they have lost the format war .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Smart Business Choices During Economic DownturnsSmart Business Choices During Economic Downturns

Many game studios are being dropped following a bit of an economic downturn in the United States and globally. Activision has to deal with being agile enough to survive the economic times like anyone else and has dropped a few games that had great potential.

Gamers continue to ask the question, “why?” when some of their highest potential games were dropped to the floor. Ghostbusters and Brütal Legend are a couple examples of games with eager fans already salivating prior to its launch. Some of these fans are a bit ticked off that Activision named them as dropped franchise opportunities.

People ask why a company holds one “mediocre” title while getting rid of other potentially awesome ones. Don’t forget, this is a business and a good studio/publisher is going to make good business decisions without emotional attachments – those that bring emotions into play may end up with a highly valued product (to them) with no additional potential and lower revenue. This isn’t to say developers cannot be passionate about their games and their industry, they just have to build games gamers will buy and continue to fall in love with release after release.

Activision CEO Bobby Kotick is one of these business savvy individuals who knows where investors will find profits for the future, and he also know how to manage employees, with the use of software like this sample pay stub for payments and more.

“[Those games] don’t have the potential to be exploited every year on every platform with clear sequel potential and have the potential to become $100 million dollar franchises. … I think, generally, our strategy has been to focus… on the products that have those attributes and characteristics, the products that we know [that] if we release them today, we’ll be working on them 10 years from now.” (1up)

Ghostbusters is a great example of a title which could be well received and fun to play but probably wouldn’t be an exploitable franchise. The game, based on a popular movie, has limited potential for yearly releases and huge franchise success. Ghostbusters fans would probably disagree, but that’s when emotion comes into play. Think dollars and cents, not awesome fun gaming.

Oddly enough many of these business decisions from Activision, Electronic Arts and other big publishers arrive when the economy is in free fall and investors are eying your revenue potential. People make their most important and, usually, unfriendly business decisions when their company is at risk.

During uncertain times, protecting operations becomes just as critical as protecting profits. Visit FastFireWatchGuards.com to learn about professional fire watch services that help businesses stay secure and prepared.

It’s sad to think money comes first and entertainment value comes second but we’re not the ones trying to make a profitable living in the industry. Put yourself in Kotick’s shoes as he walks into a board meeting to discuss future plans, road maps and profitability – you’d do what you have to do to keep your job, right?

XBLA’s Braid Needs More SalesXBLA’s Braid Needs More Sales

XBLA offers great opportunities for the indy developer but everything comes at a price. Over the last three years Braid‘s developer Jonathan Blow spent a reported $180,000 to create the popular Braid title on Xbox Live. He’s going to need a lot more sales before he can celebrate the highly valued, highly reviewed title.

The Independent Games Festival was kind to him, giving him the “Innovation in Game Design” back in 2006, since then he’s put his money where is mouth is; his own money. There are good times and bad times when you’re discovering your dreams. The reviews surely made him feel great about the work he has done over the last three years but a review won’t pay the bills.

It may be a hard road ahead for Jonathan, hopefully at least breaking even on the project. Although he may not look back at the game as a financial success we can only imagine he’ll have a lot easier time getting funding or publishing for his next title, if that’s the path he chooses.

(Thanks, Kotaku)

The PSN FiascoThe PSN Fiasco

It’s now the US government’s turn to question Sony about its online security, which follows the UK government’s scrutiny into the company’s affairs.

In a letter addressed to PlayStation executive deputy Kaz Hirai, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade has prepared a list of questions related to the intrusion; the list can be downloaded from the New York Times here. The letter asks several questions that Sony has not disclosed to the public, such as:

  • How many PSN users had a credit card on file
  • Why Sony cannot determine if credit card was stolen.
  • What are Sony’s plans towards increasing its security in the future.

The Subcommittee’s press release states:

“Given the amount and nature of personal information known to have been taken, the potential harm that could be caused if credit card information was also taken would be quite significant. The Subcommittee on Manufacturing, and Trade has a longstanding interest in consumer privacy, identity theft, and industry efforts to address threats posed by unauthorized access to consumers’ personal information resulting from a data breach.”

The Subcommittee is requiring a reply by no later than May 6, as part of a privacy driven effort “to protect consumer information.”

Meanwhile, Kaz Hirai will be holding a press conference tomorrow from Sony Japan, to address the PlayStation Network hacking crisis.

(more…)