The American Entertainment Industry is Contributing to Global Piracy!

Believe it or not, there are many gamers that live outside the United States. Those of us that do not live in Japan and the US aren’t always a first priority for the entertainment industry when it comes to hot new releases, yet everyone feels the power of the marketing dollar… we’re just not all “privileged” enough to experience it on day one… or year one. Here is one such story, written by rover on of our forum posters, explaining how this leads to piracy in our global economy…

Let us pretend for a moment the best motion picture of the year ranked 10 out of 10 stars on imdb.com and was released in November 18th 2007. While the United States had access to the movie all year, distributors announced a European premiere on June 16th 2008. Months after North American the release, Europe may see this blockbuster movie in its region, leaving everyone to ask themselves, “how do I see this wonderful film now?”

The world isn’t as it once was. Years ago we found ourselves lining up on an early Saturday morning in the freezing rain just to buy a new CD or rent the latest movie on VHS. Today, people expect to get what thy want NOW. We see a spot during a commercial on TV for a new CD, movie or perhaps a TV show which spark our interest and what do we do? We can wait six days to watch the next hit TV show prime time episode or line up at CD MegaWorld Monday morning at 7am to buy the CD, or we do something entirely different: we go online. Most of us would go to amazon.com to find that excellent new artist, or perhaps itunes.com to find the latest episode of our favorite TV show.

Online is the way to go. We don’t mind paying for quality entertainment; the only thing we ask is to get some flexibility to our time schedule. Some of us may watch our hit prime time TV show at 1 AM or listening to our favorite music on the bus at 5 AM. The question is “can I?” and the answer is, “yes you can!”

Now here’s where problems arise. The “yes you can” statement only applies to one group of people, specifically the North Americans. You watched this seasons first episode of “Lost” on TV, you can go online and find out there are three full seasons of 22 episodes already aired. Great! Now all I must do is pay up roughly USD $1 per episode and I’ve got the ability to download all episodes and watch them at my own leisure… right?

According to some folks, the biggest entertainment market is video games. This is where the #$%& hits the fan! Some of the mayor distributors, *cough* EA *cough* thinks it’s a great idea to turn a blind side to the reality facing the movie industry by releasing their games on a schedule. This so called “schedule” really defines the date set for North America. Great! Just go on xbox.com and search for the release date of Rock Band 2 and you’ll find the target date for September 2008. What is the release date for the rest of the world? No information found.

Let’s turn the clocks back a year, EA released Rock Band for the 2007 holidays in the United States. When did the rest of the world see it? The UK, France and Germany received Rock Band in late May 2008 while Sweden, Italy and a handful more countries had the title in late July 2008. Norway and a few other countries got a silent release of Rock Band in September 2008! A full 10-months after the US released the hot new franchise, just in time for Rock Band 2’s release in the US!! I can see why, initially, this was a good idea; EA had time to iron out the hardware problems that arose in the US and sorted them out before going global… but… one year later?

Now back to the piracy issue… and if you’re American, this is going to shock you.

Let us look back at those TV shows. Until 1992, there was only one TV station in Norway. In 2006, the number was up to four; I bet you know there’s more quality content out there to fill up the prime time “airwaves” 250,000 times over. But, we’re in a global economy now, right? Just buy whatever you want online. Now here’s the shocking truth; lets say, for arguments sake, I’m interested in the show The Terminator – The Sarah Connor Chronicles, but the show never aired in Norway. What do I do?

The first thing I did was to check Xbox LIVE for downloads but the only thing available is the trailer for the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie. Next thing was iTunes, yep they’ve got it. Can I get it? NO! Bare in mind, I don’t mind paying for the entertainment I consume, but this is ridiculous. For me to download an episode of The Terminator – The Sarah Connor Chronicles, I first need to visit ebay.com and buy an American iTunes redeemable card, then I got to register with an online service like jetcarrier.com to get an American c/o address. Now, I need to sign up with iTunes through a proxy server, which fake my IP so it looks like I’m using an American ISP. After signing up, I cannot use my VISA card to pay for content, because my billing address is outside the US. This is where the redeemable card purchased on ebay comes in handy. Well, after a week, I’m finally able to legally pay for the content I want.

Wouldn’t it be easier and hassle free just to download the same content illegally? I would have gotten an episode in a few minutes on my 20 mbps internet connection.

In the realm of video games, Activision is on the right track. They seem to be releasing games worldwide within four weeks. This is true for CoD4, Guitar Hero 3 and GH:WT. What is EA doing? Releasing a highly awaited game like Rock Band 2 in the US, without any specific date for the European market. Now here’s the interesting thing that’s happening over here; people are buying new Xbox 360 consoles, modified NTSC (North American) boxes, just to be able to play the games. Of course, the games are illegally downloaded through popular torrent sites who have the games available now, months before the publishers commit to our region for a legal copy. These same individuals will probably not purchase the real game when it eventually comes out over here as they’ve played it enough. These same people would rather buy games for their European PAL boxes had they been available quickly after the titles initial release and press hype.

I could, of course, go on about other games released by EA, like the Medal of Honor and NFS series and Spore.. not to mention DRM methods, but that’s for another rant…

(source: gamingpodcast.net/forum)

0 thoughts on “The American Entertainment Industry is Contributing to Global Piracy!”

  1. With regards to TV and movies, I for one do not care. I realized a long time ago that american moviecompanies and american television producers don’t give a rat’s ass about europe or other parts of the world. They make movies and TV series for the home audience. If they make a little extra cash selling the series abroad or get some revenue from the box office in Europe, that’s just a little extra gravy to them. Maybe I’m just jaded or something, or just gave up fighting the inevitable, but that’s the situation.

    Games however, are a whole different matter, and I whole heartedly agree with everything you said, though I would not be so narrow as to single out EA alone.

    So keep releasing stuff half a year later in one part of the world, and keep seeing masses of people pirating your releases….

  2. Yeah, you sound a bit Jaded. I’m not sure if they feel our shows wouldn’t have a great impact abroad due to cultural differences and such, but still.

    There are plenty of neat shows on BBC that I’d love to see but we never bring them here… we ‘reproduce’ them with new actors and hope they work (ie. The Office)

    The thing is, with our current global economy you’d think they’d jump on the chances especially with online TV show websites and such, like hulu.com and others. Giving everyone a chance to be attached to our entertainment industry here in the States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Diablo 3, Finite Health and Loving ItDiablo 3, Finite Health and Loving It

Diablo 3 Lead Designer Jay Wilson sat down with Multiplayer Blog to explain how the health system works in Diablo 3 and how it differs from Diablo 2. In short, you can’t add a new feature without removing an old one, in this case we’re talking about health potions.

The goal is to broaden the Diablo audience to more than just the hardcore fans. Lets be honest with ourselves, the health potion system was way too far out of control (broken?) By mid-game or earlier, half the character inventory was full of potions and you might have just purchased shares in the potion selling company with all the spending you’ve done there. The health potion system created the infinitely powerful character, in essence, by making them immortal.

Activision Blizzard has learned a bit about their success with broad audiences in games like World of Warcraft, which has surpassed game sales over Diablo 2, their most successful game title. What they’ve decided to do in this release of Diablo is to limit the characters ability to heal and make them “mortal” again, requiring the player to use strategy, tactics and skills to defeat enemies. Rather than charging forward pressing “1” then “2” then “3” and the other hot keys for potions, you’ll be forced to back away during strong stomp attacks, mind your enemies special attacks and defend yourself.

“One of the things that happened in ‘Diablo II’,” Wilson continued, “was the player was faster than most of the monsters and had pretty much infinite health because they would just pop as many potions as they wanted. So when you have a player who has more mobility, more health and endless power, essentially the only thing you can really do to challenge [the players] is to kill them… by just spiking the difficulty.” (multiplayer blog)

Gating the users ability to heal is a classic RPG/Adventure game mechanism for changing the playing field in terms of difficulty. You can make a game with weaker enemies in abundance and still cause you harm, take a look back at Gauntlet in the arcade for an example of this method. You can build challenging enemy styles and dungeon traps to cause the player to mind their step, look at the classic Zelda series and some of their crazy enemies. A great example is the Darknuts from The Legend of Zelda, it was a small knight that could only be attacked from behind but had a sharp little dagger if you bumped them from the front. You had to use tactics to wipe out a full room of Darknuts.

Activision Blizzard will now have the option to create some fancy enemies with challenging special abilities that do not involve insta-kill upon contact battle tactics. You control a super hero character, not an immortal; there should be some challenge besides hacking and slashing through mobs of enemies. Wilson went on to say, “We can make a monster that affects your mobility, we can make a monster that has different kinds of attacks that are dangerous to you and that you actually have to avoid. And so it makes the combat a lot more interesting.”

One of the criticisms to the Diablo franchise has always been the “click fest” of battle. You sit still and click on enemies until everyone is dead. Perhaps, without having infinite potions you’ll be challenged to use your brain on occasion, like a real RPG and have more creative use of your money rather than investing a half-billion into the potion vendors.

Where does that lead the hardcore Diablo fans? Activision Blizzard hopes they’ll see a title with a lot more depth, a new style of challenge and a long term appeal.

Evolution of RPG’s – Gamers Don’t Want an End?Evolution of RPG’s – Gamers Don’t Want an End?

I remember a day when old RPG games had either a level cap or a definite ending. From Pool of Radiance to Secrets of the Silver Blades to Final Fantasy the game had a final boss or stage and often had some type of level cap. Today, gamers don’t want it to end, they’d rather have the option to wonder around aimlessly or completing minor quests in order to soak up every ounce of money they spent on the title.

linkNow even Bethesda is saying “we’ve learned our lesson” from the whiplash of ending their game title and capping levels. Gamers want to go back and re-try content they missed, they want to run side quests and talk to everyone in the world they want to grind themselves to über powerful levels and become a god in their fantasy world. Can you blame them?

You can’t really blame them for wanting to maximize the content, although it’s slightly more evolved than RPG’s of old. Perhaps it was World of Warcraft and other MMORPG’s that brought us to the stage in life where we all want to squeeze every last RPG dime out of the title. As a kid I wondered the world of Hyrule and covered every tile of graphical color, burned every bush, bombed every stone looking for all the content. However, even Zelda had an end with scrolling credits – you didn’t just land on a platform with your master sword and a dream.

Other titles have used level caps to limit you and draw you into the next release of the game. This was popular in the D&D world because the game is designed to target specific levels of difficulty. They may only allow you to gain level 10 because the enemies are no tougher than level 13, allowing the challenge to be good but not overwhelming. If they allow you to get to level 50 they’d have to design the game so all the enemies grow powerful along with you — that’s not always a desired result.

Final Fantasy is a popular franchise that typically allows you to grow infinitely powerful depending on how much time you want to spend repeat killing the same enemies. Gamers aren’t always into the grind, they just want to grind “enough” to make the challenges a little more do-able.

Today, however, with larger storage capacity, larger development teams and the desire to build more value into your gameplay experience titles have dozens of side quests and sub-plots that are totally optional. The result of so many sub-quests results in a player who is much more powerful at the end of those quests compared to a player who sticks to the narrow path of the main plot. So, games much grow dynamically challenging to keep the fun per dollar high.

Do you like your RPG’s to have a definite end and a high but capped level?

Rock and a Hard Place: Sony’s Japanese DilemmaRock and a Hard Place: Sony’s Japanese Dilemma

What a dilemma it is, Sony’s PlayStation 3 isn’t as hot as the Nintendo Wii in Japan. Even the Xbox 360 has had some minor success stories in Japan while Sony sits back saying “wtf?”

President, SCE Worldwide Studios, Shuhei Yoshida is pointing the finger at the publishers saying, “What’s happening is that lack of support from the Japanese publishers – not necessarily from intentions but from development capabilities.” (kotaku) Why, though, would publishers push to produce games on the console that’s currently losing market share?

Sony’s position is very tough to deal with because they’re not market leader so publishers are looking for the biggest bang for their proverbial “buck” and that’s not the PS3 right now. You can produce an expensive game for an expensive console or a cheaper game for a cheaper console and make more money.

How, then, can Sony get out of this situation? They must find a way to promote an incentive for publishers to create Sony exclusives or, at least, a Sony “port” of a game to build up their library of must-have titles. Perhaps Sony’s punishment at the hands of Nintendo and Microsoft in the States has a bit to do with their global marketplace issues — they need to put a concerted effort into one of their regions and champion themselves in one realm before trying for all of them. Right now, they’re a watered down expensive console with very few exclusive titles.

Metal Gear Sold 4, Home and Little Big Planet are great reasons to own a PlayStation 3 if the price was a bit more reasonable. Looking at the future, we’ve got Resistance 2 and a few other titles that may make some waves in the industry, at least in the United States, but it’s going to be an uphill battle in which they are the second best this time.

It’s always easy when you’re on the top. PlayStation 3 is not on the top so it’s time to start struggling, cutting prices or enticing publishers to build good exclusive titles.