Expert: Sony Negligent In PSN Security

An expert has given testimony to the US House of Representatives Subcomittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade during its commencement on hearings on the “unauthorized intrusion” on Sony’s PlayStation Network and Qrocity service, stating Sony knew that their security software was dated and lacked any sort of firewall against hacking.

Cybersecurity expert Dr. Gene Spafford’s testimony stated that security experts discovered discussions on forums that talked about how the PSN’s security was lacking. The threads revealed that the network was using old versions of the Apache Web server software, which “was unpatched and had no firewall installed.”

Worse, two to three months before the attack, the vulnerability was reported “in an open forum monitored by Sony employees,” but the company took no action to rectify the situation. If the testimony is accurate, Sony could be slapped with a serious criminal negligence charge.

The Sony intrusion alone compromised 100 million accounts both on the PSN and its Qriocity service, according to Spafford. He also cited the total cost of the breach to Sony, credit card companies, and other outfits, at $21 billion. Thieves in credit-card theft forums actually complained that the PSN breach was so great that it was depressing the price of such information by a “factor of five or 10” on the black market.

Spafford didn’t reserve his accusations for Sony, either. He stated that law enforcement is ill-equipped to handle cyberterrorism and cyberthieft. Additionally, most companies are not equipped with enough security measures because “investing in security measures affects the bottom line. They don’t understand the risks involved by not investing in security. … So when they are hit, they pass that cost along to their customers, and to the rest of society.” In other words, a classic case of being penny wise and pound foolish.

Spafford’s proposed solution to future security is to limit the amount of data kept by companies such as Sony and to “age the data” so it expires after a certain time.

C-Span posted the video of the testimony here.

(Thanks, GameSpot.)

0 thoughts on “Expert: Sony Negligent In PSN Security”

  1. One of the better pieces on the PSN fiasco that I’ve read, congrats Jonah!

    I had two jobs as a programmer; in both cases, interacting with the IT department felt more like interacting with Dilbert’s “Information prevention department”, ran by Catbert. They even wanted (and succeeded in one place) to push a “Service Level Agreement”: it’ll take two days to create a new password for this, seven days to do that etc.
    They just don’t put enough heart in it.

    To be fair, my very first job though was … in the IT department of my college! IT work is hard. If you screw up (and we did screw up sometimes), you could kiss your weekend goodbye . Usually, we’d investigate the issue that very evening, then tried to implement it either during the next day, or, at worst, if the computers we’d want to alter were being in use, in the weekend.
    The lessons I learned there is that: (1) you must react quickly and (2) if you put a bit of your heart into your work, you can get surprisingly good results.

    Nice find on the “depressing the price of such information by a “factor of five or 10? on the black market”. I guess the PSN issue is the equivalent of flooding the market with products 🙂

    @” limit the amount of data kept by companies such as Sony and to “age the data””
    This is security basics. If you don’t want to be responsible for safekeeping secret information, then don’t store secret information on your servers. Period.

  2. One of the better pieces on the PSN fiasco that I’ve read, congrats Jonah!

    I had two jobs as a programmer; in both cases, interacting with the IT department felt more like interacting with Dilbert’s “Information prevention department”, ran by Catbert. They even wanted (and succeeded in one place) to push a “Service Level Agreement”: it’ll take two days to create a new password for this, seven days to do that etc.
    They just don’t put enough heart in it.

    To be fair, my very first job though was … in the IT department of my college! IT work is hard. If you screw up (and we did screw up sometimes), you could kiss your weekend goodbye . Usually, we’d investigate the issue that very evening, then tried to implement it either during the next day, or, at worst, if the computers we’d want to alter were being in use, in the weekend.
    The lessons I learned there is that: (1) you must react quickly and (2) if you put a bit of your heart into your work, you can get surprisingly good results.

    Nice find on the “depressing the price of such information by a “factor of five or 10? on the black market”. I guess the PSN issue is the equivalent of flooding the market with products 🙂

    @” limit the amount of data kept by companies such as Sony and to “age the data””
    This is security basics. If you don’t want to be responsible for safekeeping secret information, then don’t store secret information on your servers. Period.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

PlayStation 3: Not About Quantity, About ProfitabilityPlayStation 3: Not About Quantity, About Profitability

The Xbox 360 price drop rumors flow like water and it’s all but officially been announced at this point. What about PlayStation 3 and their price? No.

Nobuyuki Oneda, the Sony’s chief financial officer said, “our plan is not to reduce the price. Our strategy is not to sell more quantity for PS3 but to concentrate on profitability.” (gamespot) This makes complete sense coming from their chief financial officer, as their motivation is to make money, not lose it.

The question remains, how will they actually make money if they’re no longer in the race for competitive market prices? Considering game licensing must Net them some amount of profit Sony’s idea seems to be the exact opposite of their original PlayStation method: saturate the market and sell them all games.

So far we’ve seen very few “need to have” games for the PlayStation 3 console while Xbox 360 continues to build a substantial library and Wii continues to break sales records for apparently no reason. When a game publisher has to decide on a platform to launch a new game, why would they choose the one that doesn’t care to be competitively priced in the market? The one that doesn’t care about quantity of sales?

Sony intends to reverse the entire razor blade philosophy where one sells a cheap razor and charges users for the blades over and over again. Their take on this concept is to sell really expensive razors and put out small half-quality blades. Is that a good market strategy at this point?

Episode 338: Movie TalkEpisode 338: Movie Talk

Sorry for the delay – last week Jordan had a medical emergency, but he’s all better now. In this episode, he and Jonah get sidetracked at one point talking about movies and the film At World’s End.

The actual videogame news they discuss include:

  • Nintendo evaluating new business, “studying” smart devices
  • Microsoft paying YouTubers for Xbox One mentions
  • Star Wars 1313 trademark abandoned
  • Sony creating new PS3 hardware for PS Now

This and a little Listener Feedback. This week, we’re looking for you to ask us questions.

Episode 272: Whinny 8Episode 272: Whinny 8

This week’s Gaming Podcast deals with Jordan Lund discussing how much negative flak Windows 8 has been getting, Daniel Quick being his usual Canadian self, Paul Nowak returning triumphantly, and Jonah Falcon just taking infamy in stride. This week’s Gaming Flashback is the derided Super Pitfall! for the NES.

As far as the news:

  • “Super-slim” PS3 will be a no-show at Gamescom
  • UbiSoft claims lack of new consoles penalizes creativity
  • Diablo III ‘God mode’ exploit for Wizard discovered
  • EA: Nintendo “on track to become primarily a software company”
  • Electronic Arts settles in Madden and NCAA monopoly suit

There is no Question of the Week – rather, the crew is waiting to hear your questions for them instead.