Distributed Game Development Using Contractors

Gamers around the world have noticed a large trend in the video game industry in the last 15 years, massive growth with massive projects and unbelievable costs, goals and sales. We’ve seen the impossible become achievable in epic projects like World of Warcraft and huge sales figures from Halo 3 but we’ve also seen game titles fall down in a burning wreck.

Each studio tries to beat the next studio with crisp realistic graphics, real time physics engines, life-like explosions all with huge costs. Does it all sound familiar? If you’re a movie buff you’ve probably seen movie studios cranking out the same style of movie, high computer graphic effects with talented high priced actors making longer and longer films.

The only big difference? A game studio hires most of their talent for full time positions and then has to figure out what to do with them when the project ends. Perhaps this explains Microsoft’s effort to remove game studios like Ensemble, Bungie and FASA, it’s all too much to handle when a high budget project ships and time frees up in the studio.

Grand Theft Auto IV is said to have costs 100-million dollars to produce, how much of that was man power and specialized talent that now sits idle? Many studios end with layoffs as a congratulations for the hard work while bloggers and journalists write articles about the “downfall” and “destruction” of such a studio and share holders freaking because of drastic headcount reductions.

As projects continue to reach million dollar costs and specialized talent is brought in to handle computer graphics, movies, physics and lighting we’re looking more and more like we need to change how the game industry handles projects. Mark Pacini, Todd Keller and Jack Mathews, three core developers behind the Metroid franchise have struck out on their own all while thinking about the new formation of the game industry.

Mark Pacini told gamasutra, “the model in which games are made — with a staff of people upwards of 100 people a lot of the time — is kind of outdated now.” What’s the solution? Pacini said:

“Contractors now are being used more efficiently than they’ve ever been on game projects, and it’s become a more valid way to staff up your project. Rather than being looked down upon as a company that doesn’t want to hire somebody, it’s more fiscally responsible of the company to hire contractors, not to staff up and have a mass layoff at the end.” (kotaku)

Imagine a time where developers are contract-for-hire specialists in the industry, paid to do a project and move on to another project to handle the same style of work. The end result will be a lower-budget title with equal value to the game design because studios won’t have to pay benefits, handle layoffs, any potential walk-off “packages” and all the HR overhead that goes with hiring “part time” full time developers.

This diversity may spark new competition as small contract firms and individuals bid to get the deals they want and enjoy a good income for the work they do. Those that are aces in the field will stand out and be recognized for their accomplishments more than a simple entry in a scrolling game credit.

Unfortunately, this will mean that those awesome teams and studios that brought us hot titles will be a thing of the past. This will mean less iD Softwares, Epics and Square Enix’s as things becomes smaller groups of specialized workers. However, if it means the same quality titles with less risk to publishers and developers, we may get more hot titles than ever before without huge price hikes.

0 thoughts on “Distributed Game Development Using Contractors”

  1. Most mobile phone games are done via contractors who are hired by larger companies. Babaroga, for example, has made mobile version of a lot of Electronic Arts’ major titles (Spore, The Godfather , Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer, SimCity, Splinter Cell: Pandora and Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4) as well as for Disney.

  2. Most mobile phone games are done via contractors who are hired by larger companies. Babaroga, for example, has made mobile version of a lot of Electronic Arts’ major titles (Spore, The Godfather , Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer, SimCity, Splinter Cell: Pandora and Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4) as well as for Disney.

  3. Great article Derrick. I couldn’t agree with you more. The hiring tendency for game projects is exactly as you stated and can easily be avoided if studios kept a core staff and then just added supplemental Game Contractors as needed during the project. They will end up saving a great amount in tax filings, payroll tax and administration, bonuses, benefits, and much more. Not to mention that they will save their reputation from being included in the mix of studios that are bad-mouthed for their annual, predictable massive layoffs.

    Our company, Ascendi Entertainment, is one of the few companies that is currently helping game studios to alleviate this problem. We have a full contractor management solution that provides Game Contractors to some of the top game studios. If anyone reading this is interested in our service or interested in becoming a Contractor in the game industry…you should check us out at http://www.AscendiEntertainment.com.

  4. Great article Derrick. I couldn’t agree with you more. The hiring tendency for game projects is exactly as you stated and can easily be avoided if studios kept a core staff and then just added supplemental Game Contractors as needed during the project. They will end up saving a great amount in tax filings, payroll tax and administration, bonuses, benefits, and much more. Not to mention that they will save their reputation from being included in the mix of studios that are bad-mouthed for their annual, predictable massive layoffs.

    Our company, Ascendi Entertainment, is one of the few companies that is currently helping game studios to alleviate this problem. We have a full contractor management solution that provides Game Contractors to some of the top game studios. If anyone reading this is interested in our service or interested in becoming a Contractor in the game industry…you should check us out at http://www.AscendiEntertainment.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Episode 352: Get Ready for E3 AgainEpisode 352: Get Ready for E3 Again

It’s the last podcast before E3 2014 starts on Monday. Jonah is still ravaged by the flu, while Paul’s ghost haunts the podcast.

The news this week includes:

  • Watch Dogs sells 4 million in first week
  • Xbox One getting 34 new apps
  • Sony discontinues the PSP in Japan
  • Take-Two CEO skeptical of Oculus’ broad appeal

All this and Listener Feedback as well as a new Question of the Week: “How much info do you try to glean from E3 reports?”

For whatever reason, the file is not working. To listen to the podcast, use this player:

PlayStation 3: Not About Quantity, About ProfitabilityPlayStation 3: Not About Quantity, About Profitability

The Xbox 360 price drop rumors flow like water and it’s all but officially been announced at this point. What about PlayStation 3 and their price? No.

Nobuyuki Oneda, the Sony’s chief financial officer said, “our plan is not to reduce the price. Our strategy is not to sell more quantity for PS3 but to concentrate on profitability.” (gamespot) This makes complete sense coming from their chief financial officer, as their motivation is to make money, not lose it.

The question remains, how will they actually make money if they’re no longer in the race for competitive market prices? Considering game licensing must Net them some amount of profit Sony’s idea seems to be the exact opposite of their original PlayStation method: saturate the market and sell them all games.

So far we’ve seen very few “need to have” games for the PlayStation 3 console while Xbox 360 continues to build a substantial library and Wii continues to break sales records for apparently no reason. When a game publisher has to decide on a platform to launch a new game, why would they choose the one that doesn’t care to be competitively priced in the market? The one that doesn’t care about quantity of sales?

Sony intends to reverse the entire razor blade philosophy where one sells a cheap razor and charges users for the blades over and over again. Their take on this concept is to sell really expensive razors and put out small half-quality blades. Is that a good market strategy at this point?

Michael Pachter Says Wii HD Will LaunchMichael Pachter Says Wii HD Will Launch

Wedbush Morgan Securities analyst Michael Pachter is “absolutely convinced” we’ll see a Nintendo Wii HD by 2011. What makes him so sure? In short, Nintendo will start to look bad if their console is said to be “for your mom” instead of for gamers.

What they’ve done, so far, is show the industry there is more market than just hardcore gamers. They’ve also convinced many of us that only hardcore gamers actually buy games. Nintendo says they’re selling games, we’ve just not seen any real evidence of that outside of their own first party titles.

“Nintendo has to overcome that [lack of graphics power],” said Pachter. “A Wii HD would really position Nintendo well, which is why I’m absolutely convinced there is a Wii HD coming. Businesswise, they can’t have people saying that their machine is a toy for my mom.” (gamedaily)

Nintendo obviously doesn’t to be the focus of a “your mom” joke outside of being able to boast huge sales figures. Selling the console into homes has definitely raised the awareness of their brand to gamers and non-gamers alike. Now, it seems, Nintendo is going to have to “grow up” and get with the high definition graphics crowd… by 2011.

Would you re-buy a Wii if it was in HD? It’s also important to note Prachter believed Take-Two would become EA and was “convinced” of it. That didn’t happen. Will this?