Distributed Game Development Using Contractors

September 21, 2008September 21, 2008| schommerschommer| 0 Comment| 2:17 pm
Categories:

Gamers around the world have noticed a large trend in the video game industry in the last 15 years, massive growth with massive projects and unbelievable costs, goals and sales. We’ve seen the impossible become achievable in epic projects like World of Warcraft and huge sales figures from Halo 3 but we’ve also seen game titles fall down in a burning wreck.

Each studio tries to beat the next studio with crisp realistic graphics, real time physics engines, life-like explosions all with huge costs. Does it all sound familiar? If you’re a movie buff you’ve probably seen movie studios cranking out the same style of movie, high computer graphic effects with talented high priced actors making longer and longer films.

The only big difference? A game studio hires most of their talent for full time positions and then has to figure out what to do with them when the project ends. Perhaps this explains Microsoft’s effort to remove game studios like Ensemble, Bungie and FASA, it’s all too much to handle when a high budget project ships and time frees up in the studio.

Grand Theft Auto IV is said to have costs 100-million dollars to produce, how much of that was man power and specialized talent that now sits idle? Many studios end with layoffs as a congratulations for the hard work while bloggers and journalists write articles about the “downfall” and “destruction” of such a studio and share holders freaking because of drastic headcount reductions.

As projects continue to reach million dollar costs and specialized talent is brought in to handle computer graphics, movies, physics and lighting we’re looking more and more like we need to change how the game industry handles projects. Mark Pacini, Todd Keller and Jack Mathews, three core developers behind the Metroid franchise have struck out on their own all while thinking about the new formation of the game industry.

Mark Pacini told gamasutra, “the model in which games are made — with a staff of people upwards of 100 people a lot of the time — is kind of outdated now.” What’s the solution? Pacini said:

“Contractors now are being used more efficiently than they’ve ever been on game projects, and it’s become a more valid way to staff up your project. Rather than being looked down upon as a company that doesn’t want to hire somebody, it’s more fiscally responsible of the company to hire contractors, not to staff up and have a mass layoff at the end.” (kotaku)

Imagine a time where developers are contract-for-hire specialists in the industry, paid to do a project and move on to another project to handle the same style of work. The end result will be a lower-budget title with equal value to the game design because studios won’t have to pay benefits, handle layoffs, any potential walk-off “packages” and all the HR overhead that goes with hiring “part time” full time developers.

This diversity may spark new competition as small contract firms and individuals bid to get the deals they want and enjoy a good income for the work they do. Those that are aces in the field will stand out and be recognized for their accomplishments more than a simple entry in a scrolling game credit.

Unfortunately, this will mean that those awesome teams and studios that brought us hot titles will be a thing of the past. This will mean less iD Softwares, Epics and Square Enix’s as things becomes smaller groups of specialized workers. However, if it means the same quality titles with less risk to publishers and developers, we may get more hot titles than ever before without huge price hikes.

0 thoughts on “Distributed Game Development Using Contractors”

  1. Most mobile phone games are done via contractors who are hired by larger companies. Babaroga, for example, has made mobile version of a lot of Electronic Arts’ major titles (Spore, The Godfather , Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer, SimCity, Splinter Cell: Pandora and Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4) as well as for Disney.

    Reply

  2. Most mobile phone games are done via contractors who are hired by larger companies. Babaroga, for example, has made mobile version of a lot of Electronic Arts’ major titles (Spore, The Godfather , Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer, SimCity, Splinter Cell: Pandora and Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4) as well as for Disney.

    Reply

  3. Great article Derrick. I couldn’t agree with you more. The hiring tendency for game projects is exactly as you stated and can easily be avoided if studios kept a core staff and then just added supplemental Game Contractors as needed during the project. They will end up saving a great amount in tax filings, payroll tax and administration, bonuses, benefits, and much more. Not to mention that they will save their reputation from being included in the mix of studios that are bad-mouthed for their annual, predictable massive layoffs.

    Our company, Ascendi Entertainment, is one of the few companies that is currently helping game studios to alleviate this problem. We have a full contractor management solution that provides Game Contractors to some of the top game studios. If anyone reading this is interested in our service or interested in becoming a Contractor in the game industry…you should check us out at http://www.AscendiEntertainment.com.

    Reply

  4. Great article Derrick. I couldn’t agree with you more. The hiring tendency for game projects is exactly as you stated and can easily be avoided if studios kept a core staff and then just added supplemental Game Contractors as needed during the project. They will end up saving a great amount in tax filings, payroll tax and administration, bonuses, benefits, and much more. Not to mention that they will save their reputation from being included in the mix of studios that are bad-mouthed for their annual, predictable massive layoffs.

    Our company, Ascendi Entertainment, is one of the few companies that is currently helping game studios to alleviate this problem. We have a full contractor management solution that provides Game Contractors to some of the top game studios. If anyone reading this is interested in our service or interested in becoming a Contractor in the game industry…you should check us out at http://www.AscendiEntertainment.com.

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Trading Used Games, Like Fraud? | Gaming Podcast
  6. Pingback: Trading Used Games, Like Fraud? | Gaming Podcast

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

GameSpy, UGO, 1UP Say FarewellGameSpy, UGO, 1UP Say Farewell

The videogame world has been stunned by the news that GameSpy, 1UP and UGO are all being shuttered. GameSpy had been around since 1999 (back when it was a mere online match service – game-spy, geddit?) UGO was a site that I wrote for both indirectly as an editor of GamePen and directly when I wrote DVD and game reviews for UGO.

UGO’s Chris Radtke bid farewell stating:

I’ve spent many years of my life trying to turn UGO.com into something entertaining for you guys. Hopefully you stopped by recently to watch one our funny videos. Or you found yourself debating one of our nerd culture lists, read a movie review or pondered the age old question “Who would win in a fight, a minotaur armed with a trident or a centaur armed with a crossbow.” Could be you tried to win something off our homepage or you Googled “Hot Girls” and found a couple of pics you liked. I don’t really care how you got here, just as long as you were entertained when you did.

(more…)

Read MoreRead More

Diablo 3, Finite Health and Loving ItDiablo 3, Finite Health and Loving It

Diablo 3 Lead Designer Jay Wilson sat down with Multiplayer Blog to explain how the health system works in Diablo 3 and how it differs from Diablo 2. In short, you can’t add a new feature without removing an old one, in this case we’re talking about health potions.

The goal is to broaden the Diablo audience to more than just the hardcore fans. Lets be honest with ourselves, the health potion system was way too far out of control (broken?) By mid-game or earlier, half the character inventory was full of potions and you might have just purchased shares in the potion selling company with all the spending you’ve done there. The health potion system created the infinitely powerful character, in essence, by making them immortal.

Activision Blizzard has learned a bit about their success with broad audiences in games like World of Warcraft, which has surpassed game sales over Diablo 2, their most successful game title. What they’ve decided to do in this release of Diablo is to limit the characters ability to heal and make them “mortal” again, requiring the player to use strategy, tactics and skills to defeat enemies. Rather than charging forward pressing “1” then “2” then “3” and the other hot keys for potions, you’ll be forced to back away during strong stomp attacks, mind your enemies special attacks and defend yourself.

“One of the things that happened in ‘Diablo II’,” Wilson continued, “was the player was faster than most of the monsters and had pretty much infinite health because they would just pop as many potions as they wanted. So when you have a player who has more mobility, more health and endless power, essentially the only thing you can really do to challenge [the players] is to kill them… by just spiking the difficulty.” (multiplayer blog)

Gating the users ability to heal is a classic RPG/Adventure game mechanism for changing the playing field in terms of difficulty. You can make a game with weaker enemies in abundance and still cause you harm, take a look back at Gauntlet in the arcade for an example of this method. You can build challenging enemy styles and dungeon traps to cause the player to mind their step, look at the classic Zelda series and some of their crazy enemies. A great example is the Darknuts from The Legend of Zelda, it was a small knight that could only be attacked from behind but had a sharp little dagger if you bumped them from the front. You had to use tactics to wipe out a full room of Darknuts.

Activision Blizzard will now have the option to create some fancy enemies with challenging special abilities that do not involve insta-kill upon contact battle tactics. You control a super hero character, not an immortal; there should be some challenge besides hacking and slashing through mobs of enemies. Wilson went on to say, “We can make a monster that affects your mobility, we can make a monster that has different kinds of attacks that are dangerous to you and that you actually have to avoid. And so it makes the combat a lot more interesting.”

One of the criticisms to the Diablo franchise has always been the “click fest” of battle. You sit still and click on enemies until everyone is dead. Perhaps, without having infinite potions you’ll be challenged to use your brain on occasion, like a real RPG and have more creative use of your money rather than investing a half-billion into the potion vendors.

Where does that lead the hardcore Diablo fans? Activision Blizzard hopes they’ll see a title with a lot more depth, a new style of challenge and a long term appeal.

Read MoreRead More

Kaz Hirai Dooms 360 To Short LifeKaz Hirai Dooms 360 To Short Life

Sony’s PlayStation 3 has a 10-year plan. We’ve heard about the plan, we’ve seen Sony’s current execution and we’re starting to see some of the titles making their way to the PS3 for 2009. The Xbox 360? Kaz, Sony Computer Entertainment’s head man, made his thoughts clear when speaking to Official PlayStation Magazine.

kaz“Last time I checked, they’ve never had a console that’s been on the market for more than four or five years and we’ve committed to a ten year life cycle, so you do the math…,” he says. He goes on to state that the Xbox 360 won’t have a larger install base by the end of their 10-year plan has been completed, “unless things go really bad.”

Of course, nobody says Microsoft’s 10-year plan isn’t to push out yet another console. Is that wise? We don’t really know, but you can’t count them out on it. Maybe they’ll only have half the install base but two consoles in the market within the next ten years, nobody really knows.

The one major hole we can see in his comments revolve around their claims that the Microsoft doesn’t have any history of a console being on the market for very long. If I recall, Sony managed to squeek one by on Nintendo with the original PlayStation, which changed everything for the next ten years. Sony didn’t have a 5-year track record when they started taking Nintendo down, why does Microsoft need to have an extensive resume as well?

As for Wii?

“It’s difficult to talk about Nintendo because we don’t look at their console as being competitors. They’re a different world and we operate in our world — that’s kind of the way I look at things…” (kotaku)

Say what you want about Microsoft vs. Sony, but it sure sounds like Sony doesn’t want to acknowlege Nintendo’s success because it casts a dark shadow on their own product. Nintendo and Sony have been battling for years, that’s just the way it is and that’s how the industry sees it. When NPD releases numbers, when journalists write articles about consoles and when the war is finished one thing remains constant: all three consoles are included in the equation.

Read MoreRead More