Do HD Graphics Matter To Gamers?

hdtvThe question of the day, “Do HD graphics matter to gamers?” If you’re currently rolling with a PS3 or Xbox 360 and you’ve got HDMI and or sweet component cables you’re probably saying, “duh, of course they do.” What about everyone else, those Wii consoles for instance, there are so many of those. What about gamers that do not know what HDMI means?

Let’s face it, an estimated 21-million people are still using over the air TV broadcast signal and a large portion of those think that their TV is high definition because it doesn’t have an analog dial anymore. Recent Nielson ratings are showing most gamers are still pushing PS2 hardware, which isn’t high definition.

In the US, HDTV sales only reach 25-30% of the population. Couple this with the fact that one in five HDTV owners can’t tell the difference between standard definition and high definition content and you’ve got roughly 20% of the population utilizing HD. Looking at the number of gaming consoles out there and the rate of uptake, it’s clear that a large majority of gamers are not using HD resolutions for their gaming needs. (loot-ninja)

We’d like to think 1080p looks much different than 480p but some people don’t seem to notice because, honestly, they just don’t care. We’d also like to think a PlayStation 3 buyer would be aware of the HD content and already have equipment at home to take advantage of the system. Although there are no solid facts to state otherwise, there must be a group of individuals that have purchased a PlayStation 3 and are rolling with SDTV (ghetto).

High definition graphics matter to people who want a true HD experience. Wii gamers don’t care about high definition because they’re focused on the game play environment or are just following the wave of hype and desire to own the infamous white box. The Xbox 360 gamers may go either way, a gamer wants to own the system because they can get a lot of cool new games for it secondary to the HD experience. The hot games just don’t get designed on the Xbox classic or PS2 anymore. We’d presume a PS3 gamer really wants to play a high definition game because the cost of the console is more and you’re getting a Blu-ray player all bundled into one.

HD graphics matter to us, we see the difference, respect the detail and use the HD portion of the console as an excuse for paying so much for the technology. The United States, as a whole, isn’t fully ready or equipped (mentally) for a full HD experience. When will they be prepared to experience high definition at its fullest?

My guess, five years after Nintendo makes the transition to 1080p. Nintendo is capitalizing on the “average Joe” and the average consumer is still catching up on the high definition. Hell, many gamers are still playing the dial-up game!

Maybe we need to start a new government funded orgnization: The No HD Left Behind Act. Everyone should be in HD.

0 thoughts on “Do HD Graphics Matter To Gamers?”

  1. You said: Wii gamers don’t care about high definition because they’re focused on the game play environment or are just following the wave of hype and desire to own the infamous white box.

    Who are you to tell me what I care about? You think playing on the Wii means that somehow I’ve compromised my gaming cred and thrown a desire for quality graphics out the window?

    Maybe I like a little variety in my life. Or maybe some support from veteran gamers will spur developers to follow in Sega’s footsteps and put some decent content on the little white box.

    I own and play all three systems, along with several generations of other systems. And I don’t agree that ‘gamers’ need HD graphics to enjoy a good game.

  2. i agree 100 percent on the issue i kno a lot of people wit 360 and ps3 system and people who dont have a hdtv in they house or just dont have none of them at all but when they come ovr to my house to my 360 they be like wtf where can i get that at or how u get a 360 wit hdmi on it mines doesnt have that at all i just tellem go to walmart or best buy yes fa the record i have a sony 60 1080p full hd with a halo3 edititon xbox and a 1200 watt onkyo 7.1 fa my gaming rig but i gave my ps3 to my brother in 07 they didnt have enough games for me oh and one more thing u can watch blu ray movies on ya 360 ya dig

  3. Totally agree with this post. The truth is, it really doesn’t matter. Many people have come this far without HD and are happy to wait and see, it just isn’t seen as essential.

  4. @bustin98: Who am I? I’m a guy writing an article about why Wii gamers don’t care about HD graphics? Who are you?

    Yeah, I own a Wii as well along with a 360. My Wii is on my HD TV as well. Maybe I too bought it for “variety” and all that. When I purchased the Wii, I didn’t care about HD graphics so it wasn’t a big deal that it was 480p.

    Does that change anything? No, not really. And, believe it or not “you” wasn’t speaking directly to you. It’s talking about the majority of Wii gamers, the average joe, the bigger pool of Wii owners.

    The world doesn’t revolve around you. Believe it or not, I didn’t write the article about you directly. 🙂 I wrote it about the obvious trend in the industry which goes against what most folks would think, that high definition graphics in gaming are all that matters. They’re not, and the Wii provides some proof to that (and so does the fact that less than half the US has high definition to begin with).

    It will all catch on eventually. Black & White TV’s existed for a long time after color was in production. TV’s aren’t investments people buy every two to four years like a PC or other gadget.

  5. Whnen I first got the 360, I briefly played on SDTV, and didn’t see any real diff between it and the Xbox 1.

    Then I got HDTV, and Need for Speed: Most Wanted transformed itself in HD. My jaw dropped.

  6. I got a Wii, cuz i had been a Nintendo Fanboy since the NES days, and men, i’m not regretting getting that little box. I’m loving it more and more.

    On the other hand, i also had a PS3, and i love it also, but the lack of good games, or that the sequels I waited so much for, and hence, bought the console for, aren’t appealing to me as much as I wanted. Also, playing the PS3 on a 21″ SDTV kill most of the text. We can see that most PS3/360 developers hadn’t gave a though about people who can’t afford the TV or don’t want to upgrade just yet to a HDTV and they don’t optimize the text for those resolution, making the text al blurry and hard to read, while on the Wii, you can read most of the text perfectly.

    Still, i’m getting a 32″ HDTV LCD soon, just waiting for a loan to be repaid and then i’m getting one, still, the lack of consideration on the side of the developers is quite heartbreaking.

    I had a friend who though that the graphics at Home were groundbreaking. I saw em on my SDTV, and on a 42″ HDTV with HDMI at a friend house, and I still can’t get to see those ground breaking graphics he’s talking about, i just see the average PS3 power being used over there

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Episode 250: Do the Time Warp AgainEpisode 250: Do the Time Warp Again

It’s the fabulous 250th Episode milestone, and this particular podcast features a major surprise for longtime listeners. Not only is this one of the funniest podcasts in a long while, but there’s plenty of show to go around, too. First, the Gaming Flashback checks out the classic shooter No One Lives Forever, while the Gaming History examines the infamous Gizmondo handheld gaming console.

As for the news:

  • Hirai: Sony could be facing “serious trouble
  • Take Two CEO states “strong become stronger” with next-gen transitions
  • Developer Starbreeze fears Syndicate may be “too hard
  • Oklahoma state rep wants 1% violent videogame tax
  • Ubisoft cuts off legit players With DRM server migration

There’s no Question of the Week, but we’re definitely sure there will be plenty of comments for the podcast hosts.

Episode 252: DuckTalesEpisode 252: DuckTales

This week, Paul can’t make it, so we bring on a Paul substitute, Dan Quick of the PolyCast podcast – and the show doesn’t skip a beat thanks to Dan behaving like Paul without realizing it. This week’s Gaming Flashback explodes like a blood sausage with Wasteland.

This week’s news items include:

  • Dashboard update gives Indie Marketplace more visibility
  • Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 outed by Amazon France
  • Skyrim DLC won’t follow same model as Fallout DLC
  • Electronic Arts terminates “free Battlefield 3 for preordering Mass Effect 3” deal early
  • Alan Wake on PC because Remedy “a nagging little kid” to Microsoft

In addition, we have Reader Feedback for Paul’s Pixie Diamonds contest – the winners will be determined next week. The contest’s Question of the Week remains the same: “Who is your favorite Disney Prince or Hero, and why?”

Evolution of RPG’s – Gamers Don’t Want an End?Evolution of RPG’s – Gamers Don’t Want an End?

I remember a day when old RPG games had either a level cap or a definite ending. From Pool of Radiance to Secrets of the Silver Blades to Final Fantasy the game had a final boss or stage and often had some type of level cap. Today, gamers don’t want it to end, they’d rather have the option to wonder around aimlessly or completing minor quests in order to soak up every ounce of money they spent on the title.

linkNow even Bethesda is saying “we’ve learned our lesson” from the whiplash of ending their game title and capping levels. Gamers want to go back and re-try content they missed, they want to run side quests and talk to everyone in the world they want to grind themselves to über powerful levels and become a god in their fantasy world. Can you blame them?

You can’t really blame them for wanting to maximize the content, although it’s slightly more evolved than RPG’s of old. Perhaps it was World of Warcraft and other MMORPG’s that brought us to the stage in life where we all want to squeeze every last RPG dime out of the title. As a kid I wondered the world of Hyrule and covered every tile of graphical color, burned every bush, bombed every stone looking for all the content. However, even Zelda had an end with scrolling credits – you didn’t just land on a platform with your master sword and a dream.

Other titles have used level caps to limit you and draw you into the next release of the game. This was popular in the D&D world because the game is designed to target specific levels of difficulty. They may only allow you to gain level 10 because the enemies are no tougher than level 13, allowing the challenge to be good but not overwhelming. If they allow you to get to level 50 they’d have to design the game so all the enemies grow powerful along with you — that’s not always a desired result.

Final Fantasy is a popular franchise that typically allows you to grow infinitely powerful depending on how much time you want to spend repeat killing the same enemies. Gamers aren’t always into the grind, they just want to grind “enough” to make the challenges a little more do-able.

Today, however, with larger storage capacity, larger development teams and the desire to build more value into your gameplay experience titles have dozens of side quests and sub-plots that are totally optional. The result of so many sub-quests results in a player who is much more powerful at the end of those quests compared to a player who sticks to the narrow path of the main plot. So, games much grow dynamically challenging to keep the fun per dollar high.

Do you like your RPG’s to have a definite end and a high but capped level?