Do HD Graphics Matter To Gamers?

hdtvThe question of the day, “Do HD graphics matter to gamers?” If you’re currently rolling with a PS3 or Xbox 360 and you’ve got HDMI and or sweet component cables you’re probably saying, “duh, of course they do.” What about everyone else, those Wii consoles for instance, there are so many of those. What about gamers that do not know what HDMI means?

Let’s face it, an estimated 21-million people are still using over the air TV broadcast signal and a large portion of those think that their TV is high definition because it doesn’t have an analog dial anymore. Recent Nielson ratings are showing most gamers are still pushing PS2 hardware, which isn’t high definition.

In the US, HDTV sales only reach 25-30% of the population. Couple this with the fact that one in five HDTV owners can’t tell the difference between standard definition and high definition content and you’ve got roughly 20% of the population utilizing HD. Looking at the number of gaming consoles out there and the rate of uptake, it’s clear that a large majority of gamers are not using HD resolutions for their gaming needs. (loot-ninja)

We’d like to think 1080p looks much different than 480p but some people don’t seem to notice because, honestly, they just don’t care. We’d also like to think a PlayStation 3 buyer would be aware of the HD content and already have equipment at home to take advantage of the system. Although there are no solid facts to state otherwise, there must be a group of individuals that have purchased a PlayStation 3 and are rolling with SDTV (ghetto).

High definition graphics matter to people who want a true HD experience. Wii gamers don’t care about high definition because they’re focused on the game play environment or are just following the wave of hype and desire to own the infamous white box. The Xbox 360 gamers may go either way, a gamer wants to own the system because they can get a lot of cool new games for it secondary to the HD experience. The hot games just don’t get designed on the Xbox classic or PS2 anymore. We’d presume a PS3 gamer really wants to play a high definition game because the cost of the console is more and you’re getting a Blu-ray player all bundled into one.

HD graphics matter to us, we see the difference, respect the detail and use the HD portion of the console as an excuse for paying so much for the technology. The United States, as a whole, isn’t fully ready or equipped (mentally) for a full HD experience. When will they be prepared to experience high definition at its fullest?

My guess, five years after Nintendo makes the transition to 1080p. Nintendo is capitalizing on the “average Joe” and the average consumer is still catching up on the high definition. Hell, many gamers are still playing the dial-up game!

Maybe we need to start a new government funded orgnization: The No HD Left Behind Act. Everyone should be in HD.

0 thoughts on “Do HD Graphics Matter To Gamers?”

  1. You said: Wii gamers don’t care about high definition because they’re focused on the game play environment or are just following the wave of hype and desire to own the infamous white box.

    Who are you to tell me what I care about? You think playing on the Wii means that somehow I’ve compromised my gaming cred and thrown a desire for quality graphics out the window?

    Maybe I like a little variety in my life. Or maybe some support from veteran gamers will spur developers to follow in Sega’s footsteps and put some decent content on the little white box.

    I own and play all three systems, along with several generations of other systems. And I don’t agree that ‘gamers’ need HD graphics to enjoy a good game.

  2. i agree 100 percent on the issue i kno a lot of people wit 360 and ps3 system and people who dont have a hdtv in they house or just dont have none of them at all but when they come ovr to my house to my 360 they be like wtf where can i get that at or how u get a 360 wit hdmi on it mines doesnt have that at all i just tellem go to walmart or best buy yes fa the record i have a sony 60 1080p full hd with a halo3 edititon xbox and a 1200 watt onkyo 7.1 fa my gaming rig but i gave my ps3 to my brother in 07 they didnt have enough games for me oh and one more thing u can watch blu ray movies on ya 360 ya dig

  3. Totally agree with this post. The truth is, it really doesn’t matter. Many people have come this far without HD and are happy to wait and see, it just isn’t seen as essential.

  4. @bustin98: Who am I? I’m a guy writing an article about why Wii gamers don’t care about HD graphics? Who are you?

    Yeah, I own a Wii as well along with a 360. My Wii is on my HD TV as well. Maybe I too bought it for “variety” and all that. When I purchased the Wii, I didn’t care about HD graphics so it wasn’t a big deal that it was 480p.

    Does that change anything? No, not really. And, believe it or not “you” wasn’t speaking directly to you. It’s talking about the majority of Wii gamers, the average joe, the bigger pool of Wii owners.

    The world doesn’t revolve around you. Believe it or not, I didn’t write the article about you directly. 🙂 I wrote it about the obvious trend in the industry which goes against what most folks would think, that high definition graphics in gaming are all that matters. They’re not, and the Wii provides some proof to that (and so does the fact that less than half the US has high definition to begin with).

    It will all catch on eventually. Black & White TV’s existed for a long time after color was in production. TV’s aren’t investments people buy every two to four years like a PC or other gadget.

  5. Whnen I first got the 360, I briefly played on SDTV, and didn’t see any real diff between it and the Xbox 1.

    Then I got HDTV, and Need for Speed: Most Wanted transformed itself in HD. My jaw dropped.

  6. I got a Wii, cuz i had been a Nintendo Fanboy since the NES days, and men, i’m not regretting getting that little box. I’m loving it more and more.

    On the other hand, i also had a PS3, and i love it also, but the lack of good games, or that the sequels I waited so much for, and hence, bought the console for, aren’t appealing to me as much as I wanted. Also, playing the PS3 on a 21″ SDTV kill most of the text. We can see that most PS3/360 developers hadn’t gave a though about people who can’t afford the TV or don’t want to upgrade just yet to a HDTV and they don’t optimize the text for those resolution, making the text al blurry and hard to read, while on the Wii, you can read most of the text perfectly.

    Still, i’m getting a 32″ HDTV LCD soon, just waiting for a loan to be repaid and then i’m getting one, still, the lack of consideration on the side of the developers is quite heartbreaking.

    I had a friend who though that the graphics at Home were groundbreaking. I saw em on my SDTV, and on a 42″ HDTV with HDMI at a friend house, and I still can’t get to see those ground breaking graphics he’s talking about, i just see the average PS3 power being used over there

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Beta: Wrath of the Lich King – Initial ReactionBeta: Wrath of the Lich King – Initial Reaction

The long awaited Wrath of the Lich King is here! By long awaited, really, I mean, I waited a long time to get patch after patch of the next expansion to Blizzards best of MMORPG. Although I don’t know the architecture to creating the patches, it seems so dated in methodology. Why must I download 5GB of patches when one can just supply me with an option to pull everything.

The initial download was roughly 1.8GB for what I assume would be “the DVD” you’d be buying in the store. Once I install that baseline it requires another roughly 1.2GB “update” before you can launch the application. Once you launch the WoW executable it must download another 500MB or so of patch data followed by another 100MB of patch data followed by another 500MB of patch data. Then, and only then, can you login and start playing!

My first option was to use the character I transferred over from Scarlet Crusade and jump into the world. Wishfully thinking, I also migrated over my addons to see what would work. After receiving more errors than I can explain I logged out and disabled all the addons. We’ll wait on those.

Within seconds I noticed the date in the top corner, it seems WoW has evolved over the years from a black vortex of time suckage to something a bit more user friendly. An older patch included a clock on the map so you know how many hours you’ve got before the sunrises, allowing you to sneak in a few hours of sleep before work. Now, they’ve included a calendar so you will know just how many days you’ve been up without food or drink. I kid.

(more…)

Rhythm Gaming Saturation Point?Rhythm Gaming Saturation Point?

Rhythm Gaming is all the rage, or is it? Turns out Guitar Hero: World Tour didn’t meet or exceed the figures they hit with Guitar Hero III. Where GH3 brought in $115 million in the first week, GHWT brought in $67 million in the same time frame.

Why?

There are plenty of factors that could cut down the sales units, considering those that can purchase Guitar Hero World Tour don’t have to purchase additional instruments to play the game like they played GH3.

  • Rock Band 2: This game arrived before Guitar Hero 3 and folks went for this game instead because it was first to launch. Some gamers have to make a choice on which to purchase because they can’t buy both.
  • Hot Games: Although Rhythm gaming can be fun, a lot of great games are arriving this season so gamers have to make some big decisions.
  • Economics: The economy isn’t exactly thriving right now and retail outlets are already predicting less than stellar numbers.
  • Saturation: Since the original Guitar Hero game, we’ve had a number of titles from Activision including their Aerosmith edition and Harmonix pulling out Rock Band and Rock Band 2. There is talk of a Hendrix version and a Metallic release – how much is too much?

We know people love charts, so here is another to toss at you via Kotaku:

Guitar Hero World Tour Sales, via Kotaku

The break down from Guitar Hero 3 to World Tour is obvious, also apparent is the shift in console when buying into the rhythm gaming franchises. The Wii has started taking more market share, odd considering the DLC isn’t there, and the PS3 is showing its lackluster sales of the console by growing in proportion but not excelling to grab huge share (PS3 fanboys attack!). Sony kicked ass by taking control of the share using their PlayStation 2 with Guitar Hero 3, but has lost that lead for the World Tour.

Will these lower sales figure change the future roadmap for Activision in their Guitar Hero franchise or are they satisfied taking home $67 million in the first week of the launch. That is still a lot of money and probably doesn’t even consider any money they could (or will) potentially make on the World Tour hardware.

Luckily, the rhythm gaming content doesn’t get old with age, it just gets more classic. No doubt Guitar Hero World Tour will be landing in homes over the holidays and into 2009.

Trading Used Games, Like Fraud?Trading Used Games, Like Fraud?

David Braben, founder of Frontier Developments, says retail outlets that buy and sell pre-owned games are “essentially defrauding the industry.” Although multiplayer gaming might not be a huge threat, the single player experience in games may die out because gamers play the game quickly and resell it back to places like GameStop for others to buy.

Developers don’t get a dime when a game goes traded, many gamers will “share” the single player experience with a single copy of the game by reselling it over and over. The end result, retail outlets make a good penny for marking up old games while developers see nothing. This is really how game retail outlets survive because the margins on video games is so damn low.

The story has been heard before, developers want a piece of the action so they’re taking steps to entice people to keep the game with renewed downloadable content on old games; you can’t experience the new content without keeping the game around longer. In the world of low margin games, high cost development and short-lived story lines the solutions to this problem aren’t exactly obvious.

Braben’s idea of a solution is to offer two versions of the game, a not for resale/rental version at a high price, say $160, and a low priced version that cannot be shared (heavily DRM’ed?) for $50. In essence, gamers would no longer be able to trade in games because the idea of spending double for a game so you can resell it makes no sense to most gamers (including myself.)

(more…)