Wii Will Beat PS2 in Sales, PS3 Like GameCube?

If the sales continue as they have been for Nintendo and their little white Wii, you’ll be looking at the top-dog for overall console says–best selling console ever. This would push Sony’s PlayStation 2 to the second spot of awesome console victories over the last seven generations of gaming hardware.

gamecubeBefore Sony fans unite to comment storm, remember, the PS2 had a lot of great games and continues to have games coming through for its console. People are still debating the life-span of the Wii product line, regardless to overall sales figures while the PS2 no doubt had a long live and still continues to have a long life, heck 30%+ of gamers still play the darn thing. Sony has been able to utilize the PS2 and its profitability to glide through the initial PS3 sales slump and get the momentum growing for their current generation console.

Yet, some folks are comparing the PlayStation 3 to the GameCube in terms of sales performance.

“During the first 26 month period, the PS3 sold 6.79 million units in the U.S., compared to 6.75 million GameCubes during its first 26 months. While the GameCube finished a distant third last generation, the console was profitable for Nintendo.” (Kotaku)

Before you get out your flame pens, this analogy wasn’t constructed by me, I’m merely the messenger. Again, to defend Sony (read: put on  my flame retardant outfit) Sony’s console is slowly building momentum, depending on who’s statistics you read anyway, and their product will eventually become a profitable sale. The GameCube was profitable as well but boasted “dozens” of great games to play while the PS3 obviously is pushing to become the hardcore gamers console of choice with top tier graphics, blu-ray playback and a free online service. GameCube was really just a cube that played some games, a one-trick-poney as it where.

It still feels odd to say Nintendo is winning and Sony isn’t winning (I avoid the term losing to yet again to kill the flames) and… Microsoft?

Microsoft, in my opinion, is in the best possible situation. They’re not being targetted as the number one console and being critizised for holding such a position and they’re not dragging near the bottom to be poked fun at by the industry and bloggers around the world (mainly, the United States.) They’re stealthing by with good sales compared to the last generation console by “improving its fortunes.” The Xbox 360 “sells 18 percent faster than its predecessor, according to NPD figures, and even turned a profit, something the original Xbox never did” according to VentureBeat.

The PlayStation 3 has many years ahead of it and we’re sure plenty of gamers will eventually buy into the console because the technology within that black box is designed to last many years. Considering only 30% of the United States is rolling with an HD-TV it’s not surprising they’re not jumping at the opportunity to own a PlayStation 3. Why is the news all over the PlayStation 3 and talking trash about it? Sony was the console to beat when the PlayStation 2  reigned the industry, to see the console go from #1 to #3 in a single generation is shocking but not new; we saw Nintendo suffer the same fate when the PlayStation originally launched.

But, is the PS3 like the GameCube? There are too many factors to make that comparison, especially considering the growth in the game industry, the growth of storage and video technology and the general acceptance of video games. Hell, you can buy video games at convenience stores in the United States now, the industry isn’t the same as it was in 2001.

Please discuss…but don’t shoot the messenger. 🙂

0 thoughts on “Wii Will Beat PS2 in Sales, PS3 Like GameCube?”

  1. I think that while the PS3 had a slow start, it can definitely take off. People are focusing too much on sales, rather than Sony’s ten year plan for the console. Sony’s not just going to drop the PS3. As of right now, they’re focused on making a profit, not outselling anyone. They will start to get more competitive this year once they approach break even and so forth.

  2. Price-wise competitive, yes. I think the slow sales is all about the price point. And, if you’re already taking a big hit on cost to get the word out and have been for two years, cutting it more now isn’t really going to help anyone.

    Sony, like Microsoft, has one big advantage over other would-be console sellers: they have many avenues for income. Nintendo could never afford to take a two-year console loss on a product line but Sony has its hands in so many markets this is just the price of doing business for them.

    Really, if they were to drop the PS3 it wouldn’t be their games division making that decision, it would be the board getting sick of seeing negative losses on their balance sheets. And, that should only happen if the company itself was in a bad situation or the board didn’t have the vision for the game industry anymore.

    Right now, I don’t see that happening. If Sony gets itself into trouble with its other streams of revenue than perhaps that would change. But, I don’t know about you, I still buy Sony equipment outside of gaming.

  3. I think that Sony in the end will beat Microsoft at least, with Nintendo no so far ahead. Once Sony gets to break even, they will get more agressive and competitive and the PS3 will have a sales boost that will define this era.

  4. Mr. Schommer:

    I like this version much better than the one I read on this other site last night. Your flamesuit is quite robust, sir.

    I think part of the problem with this generation is the excess of pundits. There are much too many people speculating and spinning numbers that it is rather hard to see what is truly going on.

    But the bottomline is, that the Wii and the 360 are peaking at the moment, while the PS3 is just starting to gain steam (but for how long is really up to how soon Sony decides to permit a pricecut).

    IMO, the PS3 launched a year too early. It only created a distraction in the market, and developers simply weren’t ready to take advantage of the hardware. I realize that would have had problems of its own (letting MS and Nin run wild without Sony’s check for an additional year), but they may have at least been able to avoid all the scrutiny, and a poor introduction.

    But at the end of the day, the hardware has so much untapped potential, and it is much to early to call this a loss for them.

    1. Yeah, I won’t call it a loss until Sony decides to produce their next console, if this one hasn’t lived up to its potential than we can make a call. They’ve lost money for two years, if they make profit for six, it’s a win.

  5. PS3 the next Gamecube? For that to happen wouldn’t it have to be affordable to the general public and turn a profit for the manufacturer?

    BURN! I so went there!

  6. the first year and a half of the PS3 was about blu-ray and nothing more. Consider the losses on the PS3 as the advertising budget for blu ray which will bring revenue for Sony for many many years

  7. For anyone stupid enough to believe the PS3 is performing like the Gamecube, let me make it clear for you:

    FACT – the Gamecube sold roughly 24 million (Not more) units in it’s ENTIRE lifetime.

    FACT – the PS3 has sold 20 million units in it’s first 2 years (Or one quarter of it’s lifetime).

    FACT – in order for the PS3 to be the next Gamecube it would have to sell a maximum of 500,000 units per year WORLDWIDE for the rest of it’s life!

    FACT – you’d have to suffer from mental retardation to believe that’s what’s gonna happen.

    I’m glad i could clear that up.

    Also, for the 360 fanboys here wanting to compare numbers – chew on theese:

    The 360 has sold 28 million in 3 years = 9.33 million per year.

    The PS3 has sold 20 million in 2 years = 10 million per year.

    In 3 years the PS3 will have sold an expected 30 million units – that’s MORE than what the 360 managed. So which console looks like the “Next Gamecube”??? Number’s really don’t lie………………

    Also, don’t even get me started on Japaneese hardware sales……the 360 is the cheapest console on the market and still only holds single – digit market share??? It can’t sell 1 million units in THREE YEARS??? What the heck is wrong with it???

    Next Gamecube? The Gamecube performed MUCH better than the 360…….the 360 should be called the “Next Dreamcast”.

  8. Look at NPD sales since launch. The Wii and PS3 have been on sale for 26 months.

    Of those 26 months the Wii has been the #1 selling machine 23 times and the #2 selling machine 3 times. It has never slipped to 3rd place.

    The Xbox 360 has been the #1 selling machine 3 times (the first two months the Wii came out and the month Halo 3 came out), the #2 selling machine 18 times and the #3 selling machine 5 times.

    The PS3 on the other hand has NEVER been the #1 selling machine, it’s been the #2 selling machine just 5 times and has been the #3 selling machine 21 out of 26 months.

    Month Wii X360 PS3
    November-06 476,000 511,000 197,000
    December-06 604,200 1,100,000 490,700
    January-07 436,000 294,000 244,000
    February-07 335,000 228,000 127,000
    March-07 259,000 199,000 130,000
    April-07 360,000 174,000 82,000
    May-07 338,000 155,000 82,000
    June-07 381,800 198,400 98,500
    July-07 425,000 170,000 159,000
    August-07 403,600 276,700 130,600
    September-07 501,000 527,800 119,400
    October-07 519,000 366,000 121,000
    November-07 981,000 770,000 466,000
    December-07 1,350,000 1,260,000 797,600
    January-08 274,000 230,000 269,000
    February-08 432,000 254,600 280,800
    March-08 721,000 262,000 257,000
    April-08 714,200 188,000 187,100
    May-08 675,100 186,600 208,700
    June-08 666,700 219,800 405,500
    July-08 555,000 205,000 225,000
    August-08 453,000 195,200 185,400
    September-08 667,000 347,200 232,400
    October-08 803,000 371,000 190,000
    November-08 2,040,000 836,000 378,000
    December-08 2,150,000 1,440,000 726,000

  9. Look at Japaneese sales figures since the launch of the PS3 – the Xbox 360 has NEVER been the #1 selling game’s console on the market. Even when it was there by itself for an entire year it still often got outsold by the PS2.

    Then look at the WORLDWIDE sales figures, which is more, 10 million per year or 9.33 million per year??? YOU do the math.

  10. Who cares about Japanese sales? There’s big difference when the Xbox 360 sales 1.4M while the PS3 sells 700K in the US during December, and the PS3 sells 40K and the 360 sells 10K.

    700K difference > 30K difference

  11. @David – You really don’t want to look at worldwide numbers:

    http://www.vgchartz.com/

    Wii – 7.72M Japan
    Wii – 21.36M America
    Wii – 17.14M Others
    Wii Total – 46.21M

    X360 – 0.90M Japan
    X360 – 16.03M America
    X360 – 10.90M Others
    X360 Total – 27.82M

    PS3 – 2.79M Japan
    PS3 – 7.64M America
    PS3 – 9.41M Others
    PS3 Total – 19.84M

    Sooo…. Wii – #1 in Japan, #1 in the US, #1 in “Others”.

    X360 – #3 in Japan, #2 in the US, #2 in “Others”.

    PS3 – #2 in Japan, #3 in the US, #3 in “Others”.

    Overall – Wii #1.

    X360 #2, 18.39 million out of first place.

    PS3 #3, 7.98 million out of 2nd place, 26.37 million out of first place.

  12. Jordan – i think it’s YOU who doesn’t want to look at worldwide numbers:

    Xbox 360 has been out for 3 years and has sold 28 million = 9.33 million per year.

    PS3 has been out for 2 years and has sold 20 million = 10 million per year.

    So which console is selling more??? Figure it out…………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Microsoft Says They’ll Win Console WarMicrosoft Says They’ll Win Console War

Apparently the war is in full force and Microsoft’s Don Mattrick is ready to poke the flag in the ground and call it a sure fire victory (in so many words). He said he’s “willing to declare here today that Xbox 360 will sell more consoles worldwide this generation than PS3” (eurogamer)

They’re either not seeing the Wii as a competitor or are trying to avoid that evil word considering the growth of the tiny little console in the market. After telling the audience the Xbox 360 has already outpaced the PlayStation 3 and Wii he failed to mention the one-year head start the 360 had over its competitors.

There are, of course, bonuses to talking figures when you were first out of the gate. The interesting facts, which won’t present themselves for years now, will be the end unit sales figures for Wii, 360 and PlayStation 3 when all boxes are end-of-life’d. We’re sure to hear each side declare victory when they’ve decided when the war actually ends. In Microsoft’s eyes, the console war will probably end when they release the next-generation box, barring the fact that they should wait at least one year before claiming the title.

You can’t argue with the facts, Xbox 360 is doing very well in the United States (if we ignore Japan). The Nintendo Wii has sold 8.8 million units to the Xbox 360‘s 10.3 million units. How many units did the Xbox 360 have sold around the same time Nintendo boasts 8.8 million? Probably a bit less.

Press can be a great thing when you have numbers to play with and figures to skew. Oddly enough, if some of us are any indication, we’ve purchased multiple Xbox 360’s because of dead systems. Sure, we’re stupid for actually doing it, but those figures will work into the total units sold for the Xbox 360 hardware sales. Imagine, their failing systems may have actually boosted sales figures a bit; probably not statistically significant but funny non-the-less.

We can’t wait to see what type of numbers Sony and Nintendo are going to fling out. If we ask each competitor, we’re sure they’ll say we’re going to win the console war. Nintendo may just ask, “what console war? We just make game hardware” and you can’t fault them there!

Xbox 360 Fall Update Too Big For Diskless UsersXbox 360 Fall Update Too Big For Diskless Users

If you’ve got an Xbox 360 arcade edition or an older console without a hard disk, you’ll want to clear up at least 128MB of your flash card before powering on your console after the fall update hits. Wait, you’re flash disk isn’t 128MB in size? Oh oh.

Latest reports are stating that consumers that own a 360 without a hard disk, albeit a small group, will not be able to simply install the fall update as the rest of us because they don’t have enough disk capacity. What is Microsoft doing about that? Microsoft’s Larry Hryb says saying they will be “offering storage solutions” for such customers.

We’re wondering, are they going to actually ship people free hard disks? Perhaps a coupon for a larger flash card? Interesting indeed!

“The new Xbox experience will require 128MB of free space. A hard drive is recommended for the optimal experience, to take advantage of some new features, and to be able to enjoy the great movies, TV shows and games available on Xbox LIVE. While we expect the majority of consumers to download the New Xbox Experience without a problem, a small percentage of Xbox 360 owners do not have enough memory to accommodate the update. To help ensure all Xbox LIVE members are able to download the New Xbox Experience and enjoy its new features, Microsoft will be offering storage solutions to the Xbox LIVE community. We are not sharing details of this offering yet. Be sure to check xbox.com for more details in the coming weeks.” (1up)

It was really only a matter of time before the Xbox 360 out grew the fact that they allow consumers to roll with a diskless console. No other console limits you by having both a disk and diskless option; we know why they did it, but now it would seem their having some growing pains.

No doubt, the next Xbox 360 console will come complete with hard disk! Hopefully you were wise and got the bigger console complete with disk.

Eidos and Square Enix Birth Great ThingsEidos and Square Enix Birth Great Things

tombraiderEidos was founded in 1990 and has been the king of its own destiny since its inception. As part of Square-Enix, Eidos and its destiny were called into question, would they continue to run the show or would they become one with Square-Enix. Square-Enix has come out to say they’ll be leaving Eidos to themselves and allow creativity to flow between the companies.

“This is an exciting beginning to what I believe will be an incredible journey. I am very happy that Phil Rogers has agreed to lead Eidos in what I see as an international marriage between our two companies, a marriage that will give birth to great things. Eidos is a content rich company and a culturally significant business to the Square Enix group.” (kotaku)

Square-Enix is playing it safe with this acquisition because this isn’t a great enviroment for shaking things up internally within a development studio. Eidos is well known for Tomb Raider, Hitman, Deus Ex, Thief and many other great projects and have built a solid foundation for the future.

A mind-share between these two groups is a powerful enemy to the competitors if they’re able to open a good dialog between the two companies and share resources, tools and engines. In a world of cost savings and salary cuts, leaning on each others resources to build a better product is a win.

At least we won’t have to call them Square-Enix-Edios because that’s just a mouthful!